Best Of9 min read

Best AI Agent Tools for Marketing Teams in 2026

Curated list of the top AI agent tools for marketing teams — from campaign automation to content generation. Tested and ranked by real marketing practitioners in 2026.

By AI Agents Guide Team•

Best AI Agent Tools for Marketing Teams in 2026#

Marketing teams are drowning in repetitive work — follow-up emails, social scheduling, lead scoring, report generation, and campaign copy drafts. AI agents have matured enough in 2026 to handle all of these tasks reliably, and the right stack can save a 5-person team 15–20 hours per week.

This list is based on hands-on evaluation of tools used across B2B and B2C marketing scenarios, not vendor benchmarks.

Quick Verdict: For most marketing teams, Lindy AI paired with Relevance AI covers the widest range of use cases at a reasonable price point. If you're already in the HubSpot ecosystem, HubSpot's AI features are the fastest path to automation with zero integration overhead.

How We Evaluated These Tools#

We assessed each tool against four core criteria:

  1. Task range — Does the agent handle the full marketing workflow (email, content, analytics) or just a slice?
  2. Integration depth — Does it connect to CRMs, ad platforms, and analytics tools without custom code?
  3. Reliability — How consistently does the agent produce usable output versus hallucinated or off-brand content?
  4. Learning curve — Can a non-technical marketer set up and run agents independently within a day?

Top Picks#

1. Lindy AI — Best All-Round Marketing Agent#

Lindy AI functions as a personal AI employee that handles email triage, lead qualification, meeting scheduling, and follow-up sequences autonomously. Unlike prompt-based tools, Lindy maintains context across a full workflow — it can read an inbound lead email, score it against your ICP criteria, draft a personalized reply, and schedule a call, all without human intervention.

Pros:

  • Handles multi-step email workflows end-to-end
  • Native integrations with Gmail, HubSpot, Salesforce, Calendly
  • No-code setup for most common marketing automations
  • Generous free tier (400 tasks/month)

Cons:

  • Content generation quality is functional but not exceptional for long-form copy
  • Limited A/B testing features in lower tiers

Best for: SDRs, demand gen teams, and solo marketers who need autonomous email and lead management.

Read our full Lindy AI review for a deep dive.

2. Relevance AI — Best for Custom Marketing Agents#

Relevance AI lets you build custom AI agents without code using a visual workflow builder. Marketing teams use it for competitive research agents, content brief generators, SEO topic clustering, and personalized outreach at scale.

Pros:

  • Highly customizable agent logic (no-code visual builder)
  • Built-in memory and context for multi-step research tasks
  • Strong document analysis capabilities
  • Team sharing and collaboration features

Cons:

  • Requires more setup time than plug-and-play alternatives
  • Per-task pricing can escalate for high-volume operations

Best for: Growth marketers and marketing ops teams who need agents tailored to specific workflows.

See how it stacks up in our Moveworks vs Relevance AI comparison.

3. HubSpot AI — Best for Teams Already in HubSpot#

HubSpot's AI features (embedded across its CRM, Marketing Hub, and Sales Hub) are the most frictionless option for teams already using the platform. The AI writes email sequences, scores leads, generates blog drafts, and surfaces deal risk signals — all within workflows marketers already know.

Pros:

  • Zero integration work if you're on HubSpot
  • AI suggestions are context-aware (uses your actual CRM data)
  • Strong A/B testing for AI-generated email variants
  • Excellent reporting and attribution

Cons:

  • Only valuable if you're paying for HubSpot (expensive standalone)
  • Less customizable than dedicated agent platforms
  • AI features vary significantly by plan tier

Best for: Mid-market teams on HubSpot Professional or Enterprise plans.

4. Jasper — Best for Marketing Copy at Scale#

Jasper is purpose-built for marketing content generation. Unlike general-purpose AI, Jasper's brand voice system learns your company's tone, terminology, and messaging guidelines, then applies them consistently across blog posts, ad copy, landing pages, and email.

Pros:

  • Brand voice profiles ensure on-brand output
  • Marketing-specific templates (Google Ads, email subject lines, product descriptions)
  • Campaigns feature connects content across multiple assets
  • Team collaboration and approval workflows

Cons:

  • Does not handle workflow automation (it's a content tool, not a full agent)
  • Pricing is high for individuals ($39+/month)
  • Still requires human editing for nuanced or technical topics

Best for: Content marketing teams producing high volumes of copy across multiple channels.

5. Make (Integromat) with AI Steps — Best for Workflow Automation#

Make's visual automation builder now includes native AI steps, allowing you to chain data from CRM, analytics, and ad platforms through AI processing before routing outputs to email, Slack, or content tools. It's not a dedicated marketing AI — but for orchestrating complex marketing workflows, nothing beats its flexibility.

Pros:

  • Connects 1,500+ apps with AI steps anywhere in the flow
  • Cost-effective at scale (operations-based pricing)
  • Logic branching, error handling, and retry mechanisms
  • Active community with pre-built marketing templates

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve than purpose-built marketing AI
  • AI steps require prompt engineering skills for best results
  • No built-in CRM or analytics

Best for: Marketing ops teams comfortable with automation platforms who want flexible AI integration.

6. Copy.ai — Best for Go-to-Market Teams#

Copy.ai has expanded beyond copywriting into a full GTM (go-to-market) AI platform. Its Workflows feature chains together prospect research, personalized messaging generation, and CRM updates — making it particularly strong for sales-adjacent marketing teams running ABM campaigns.

Pros:

  • GTM-specific workflows (account research, personalized prospecting)
  • 90+ copywriting templates covering the full marketing funnel
  • CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce)
  • Infobase lets you train the AI on your product and positioning

Cons:

  • Workflow feature has a learning curve
  • Quality inconsistency on technical or nuanced copy
  • Enterprise pricing not transparent

Best for: B2B marketing teams running ABM or outbound-heavy campaigns.

Comparison Table#

| Tool | Best For | Pricing (from) | No-Code? | CRM Integration | |------|----------|----------------|----------|-----------------| | Lindy AI | All-round automation | Free / $49/mo | Yes | HubSpot, Salesforce | | Relevance AI | Custom agents | $19/mo | Yes | HubSpot, Salesforce | | HubSpot AI | HubSpot users | Bundled | Yes | Native | | Jasper | Marketing copy | $39/mo | Yes | Limited | | Make + AI | Workflow automation | $9/mo | Yes | 1,500+ apps | | Copy.ai | GTM / outbound | $36/mo | Yes | HubSpot, Salesforce |

How to Choose#

If you're a solo marketer or small team: Start with Lindy AI's free tier. It handles email and lead workflows immediately, with no setup beyond connecting your inbox and calendar.

If you're in HubSpot already: Enable HubSpot AI before evaluating any third-party tools. The zero-integration advantage is significant.

If you need custom agents for specific research or content workflows: Relevance AI is worth the setup investment. Its agent customization depth is unmatched at its price point.

If content volume is your bottleneck: Jasper or Copy.ai will solve the output problem. Pair either with a workflow tool (Make or Zapier) to automate the distribution.

If you're marketing ops and own the tech stack: Make with AI steps gives you the most flexibility to build exactly what your team needs.

Further Reading#

Tags:
curationbest-ofmarketingai-automation
← Back to All Curation Lists